It's good to note this kind of priority revelation, but it's also entirely unsurprising. Concern for the Afghan people was always a proxy for other agendas that were poorly served by a US military withdrawal. That's why the corporations that own the media encouraged such a transparently false public meltdown among their vassal commentariat concerning a place and a people they'd reported on perhaps a dozen times in a decade.
I know the "afghan women" angle was literally conceived as a CIA op nearly a decade ago but it's hard not to look at this as a direct continuation of the program. Thanks, Adam, for writing and holding their feet to the fire.
It's good to note this kind of priority revelation, but it's also entirely unsurprising. Concern for the Afghan people was always a proxy for other agendas that were poorly served by a US military withdrawal. That's why the corporations that own the media encouraged such a transparently false public meltdown among their vassal commentariat concerning a place and a people they'd reported on perhaps a dozen times in a decade.
I know the "afghan women" angle was literally conceived as a CIA op nearly a decade ago but it's hard not to look at this as a direct continuation of the program. Thanks, Adam, for writing and holding their feet to the fire.